These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Virtual unenhanced phase with spectral dual-energy CT: Is it an alternative to conventional true unenhanced phase for abdominal tissues?
    Author: Jamali S, Michoux N, Coche E, Dragean CA.
    Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Sep; 100(9):503-511. PubMed ID: 31155514.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare attenuation measurements and image quality of virtual unenhanced phase (VUP) images with those of conventional true unenhanced phase (TUP) images on spectral dual energy computed tomography (DECT) with dual layer detector on abdominal tissues and to assess potential reduction in radiation dose. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 295 patients (185 men, 110 women; mean age 61±17.6 [SD] years [range: 17-95 years]) who had undergone abdominal or thoraco-abdominal CT with pre- and post-contrast imaging (portal phase) with spectral DECT with dual layer detector were retrospectively analyzed. VUP images based on portal-venous phase DECT acquisition were generated. Regions of interest were defined in abdominal tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, muscle and fat) by two independent readers. Inter-technique agreement (VUP images vs. TUP images) on attenuation measurements was assessed. Signal-to noise ratio (SNR) and image quality of TUP and VUP images were compared. The radiation dose delivered to patients was compared with the radiation dose of protocols without TUP images. RESULTS: A total of 9880 ROIs were drawn in the abdominal tissues. The difference in mean attenuation values between TUP and VUP images was less than 15 HU in 98.3% and less than 10 HU in 92.3% of all measurements. VUP images overestimated attenuation in fat comparatively to TUP images. Image quality was evaluated as good or excellent in 77% (37/48) of TUP images and 54% (26/48) of VUP images. Using VUP images instead of TUP images could decrease the radiation dose by 32%. CONCLUSION: VUP images demonstrate good agreement with TUP images in different abdominals tissues and can be obtained with similar image quality as TUP. VUP images appear as an alternative to TUP images, resulting in reduction of radiation dose delivered to the patient.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]