These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: External Validation of Models Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Author: Hueting TA, Cornel EB, Somford DM, Jansen H, van Basten JA, Pleijhuis RG, Korthorst RA, van der Palen JAM, Koffijberg H.
    Journal: Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 31158080.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Multiple statistical models predicting lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) exist to support clinical decision-making regarding extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). OBJECTIVE: To validate models predicting LNI in Dutch PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen prediction models were validated using a patient cohort of 1001 men who underwent ePLND. Patient characteristics included serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), cT stage, primary and secondary Gleason scores, number of biopsy cores taken, and number of positive biopsy cores. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration plots were used to visualize over- or underestimation by the models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: LNI was identified in 276 patients (28%). Patients with LNI had higher PSA, higher primary Gleason pattern, higher Gleason score, higher number of nodes harvested, higher number of positive biopsy cores, and higher cT stage compared to patients without LNI. Predictions generated by the 2012 Briganti nomogram (AUC 0.76) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) web calculator (AUC 0.75) were the most accurate. Calibration had a decisive role in selecting the most accurate models because of overlapping confidence intervals for the AUCs. Underestimation of LNI probability in patients had a predicted probability of <20%. The omission of model updating was a limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Models predicting LNI in PCa patients were externally validated in a Dutch patient cohort. The 2012 Briganti and MSKCC nomograms were identified as the most accurate prediction models available. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we looked at how well models were able to predict the risk of prostate cancer spreading to the pelvic lymph nodes. We found that two models performed similarly in predicting the most accurate probabilities.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]