These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Whole-Body DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Intramedullary and Extramedullary Lesions in Multiple Myeloma.
    Author: Chen J, Li C, Tian Y, Xiao Q, Deng M, Hu H, Wen B, He Y.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):514-523. PubMed ID: 31166755.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of whole-body (WB) DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting intramedullary and extramedullary lesions in multiple myeloma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included 49 patients with multiple myeloma who had undergone WB DWI and PET/CT. Intramedullary lesions for each region were scored by a scoring system using WB DWI and PET/CT separately. Extramedullary lesions seen separately on WB DWI and PET/CT per patient were recorded. Patients with diffuse lesions of the whole spine seen using both modalities were defined as group A, and those with such lesions seen on WB DWI only were defined as group B. The mean scores assigned to intramedullary lesions using the two modalities, the numbers of extramedullary lesions detected by WB DWI and PET/CT, and the mean percentages of plasma cells in the two patient groups were compared. RESULTS. Scores were higher for WB DWI than for PET/CT in all regions of the body (p < 0.05) except the skull, both in patients with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma and in previously treated patients. Mean (± SD) percentages of plasma cells were significantly higher in group A than group B (50.458% ± 16.036% vs 18.682% ± 15.524%; p = 0.00). The mean number of extramedullary lesions detected by WB DWI was slightly higher than the mean number detected by PET/CT, although there was no statistical difference (4.48 ± 6.70 vs 4.39 ± 6.46 lesions; p = 0.86). CONCLUSION. For detecting intramedullary lesions, WB DWI is more sensitive than PET/CT in all regions except the skull, both in patients with a new diagnosis and previously treated patients and especially in patients with a low percentage of plasma cells. For detecting extramedullary lesions, WB DWI has sensitivity equivalent to that of PET/CT. The use of both modalities may offer complementary information.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]