These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Medium-Sized Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Author: Shen PC, Chang WC, Lo CH, Yang JF, Lee MS, Dai YH, Lin CS, Fan CY, Huang WY.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Oct 01; 105(2):307-318. PubMed ID: 31175903.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study compared the local control and overall survival (OS) between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in medium-sized (3-8 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 2008 to October 2017, 188 patients with medium-sized HCC underwent either TACE (n = 142) or SBRT (n = 46). We adjusted for imbalances in treatment assignment using propensity score matching. Infield control (IFC) and OS were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 17.1 months for all patients and 26.6 months for surviving patients. The 3-year IFC was 63.0% for the TACE group and 73.3% for the SBRT group. Multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors for IFC as treatment modality (SBRT vs TACE), sex (female vs male), and recurrence status (recurrence vs new diagnosis). The 3-year OS was 22.9% for the TACE group and 47.4% for the SBRT group. Multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors of OS as number of tumors, treatment modality (SBRT vs TACE), albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor volume, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and recurrence status. Propensity score matching analysis revealed that the SBRT group had better IFC (3-year IFC of 77.5% vs 55.6%; P = .007) and OS (3-year OS of 55.0% vs 13.0%; P < .001) than the TACE group. For recurrent HCC, the SBRT group exhibited superior IFC (3-year IFC of 75% vs 57.5%; P = .022) and OS (3-year OS of 58.3% vs 5.9%; P < .001) compared with the TACE group. However, there was no difference in IFC or OS between TACE and SBRT for patients with newly diagnosed HCC. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT has better IFC and OS rates than TACE in patients with medium-sized HCC, particularly for recurrent cases, which warrants prospective randomized controlled trials of TACE and SBRT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]