These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Antiarrhythmic efficacy of penticainide and comparison with disopyramide, flecainide, propafenone and mexiletine by acute oral drug testing. Author: Priori SG, Bonazzi O, Facchini M, Varisco T, Schwartz PJ. Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1987 Nov 01; 60(13):1068-72. PubMed ID: 3118693. Abstract: The antiarrhythmic efficacy of a new class I agent, penticainide, was evaluated by acute oral drug testing and compared in the same patient population with the efficacy of disopyramide, flecainide, mexiletine and propafenone. Twenty-five patients with high-grade chronic ventricular arrhythmias entered the study. During acute oral drug testing, penticainide (7 mg/kg) was effective (more than 90% reduction in ventricular premature complexes and complete abolition of class 4A and 4B arrhythmias) in 17 of 25 subjects (68%). The mean plasma level of the drug at 90 minutes was 4.4 +/- 1.9 micrograms/ml; at the same time increases in the PQ interval (from 168 +/- 27 to 189 +/- 31 ms, p less than 0.0001) and QRS duration (from 89 +/- 14 to 96 +/- 18 ms, p less than 0.001) were observed. The QTc was slightly but not significantly shortened in the overall population; however, in the subgroup with a basally prolonged QTc (n = 8), a significant reduction was observed (from 456 +/- 8 to 440 +/- 18 ms, p less than 0.02). No adverse effects were reported. The antiarrhythmic efficacy of the other drugs tested in the same population was: disopyramide, 12 of 19 (63%); flecainide, 13 of 24 (54%); propafenone, 13 of 24 (54%); and mexiletine, 7 of 20 (35%). Penticainide appears to be a well-tolerated and effective compound of potential value for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]