These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Re-thinking How We Teach Quality Improvement: Adding Meaning to an ACGME Requirement.
    Author: Baxter K, Petz C, Middleton JL, Chan M.
    Journal: J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1662-1667. PubMed ID: 31197728.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Many residency programs have struggled to meaningfully meet the ACGME quality improvement (QI) requirements. Similarly, our residents were receiving limited QI education, and their longitudinal projects were ineffective. AIM: Create an integrated didactic and experiential learning environment that equips residents to become leaders of QI. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine (IM) residency program of 45 residents in a large community hospital. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: This curriculum included eight content areas. Games, real-life application, and project celebrations cultivated engagement. Sessions occurred during residents' 2-week outpatient rotations. Project development was standardized. PROGRAM EVALUATION: The QI Knowledge Application Tool-Revised (QIKAT-R) and separate surveys were used before and after the curriculum's implementation to evaluate resident QI knowledge and confidence, respectively. We also tracked QI scholarship and faculty engagement. Mean QIKAT-R scores improved significantly from 7.0 (SD 2.9) at baseline to 16.6 (SD 4.7) post-curriculum (n = 37 pairs, p = 0.043). Residents' adverse event reporting increased from 44% (19/43) at baseline to 90% (28/31) post-curriculum. Seven presentations were accepted for local, regional, and national conferences, compared with one presentation the preceding year. DISCUSSION: A QI curriculum can be successfully integrated in a "4 + 2" program.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]