These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.
    Author: Balalla SK, Medvedev ON, Siegert RJ, Krägeloh CU.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 100(10):1853-1862. PubMed ID: 31229529.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To use Rasch analysis to validate the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and existing short versions in individuals with traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injuries, with comparisons to a general population group. DESIGN: The Partial Credit Rasch model was applied to evaluate the WHOQOL-BREF as well as shortened versions using a cross-sectional study design. SETTING: Regional hospital, and national electoral sample in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with traumatic brain injury (n=74), individuals with orthopedic injuries (n=114), general population (n=140). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: WHOQOL-BREF. RESULTS: The WHOQOL-BREF met expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model and demonstrated good reliability (person separation index [PSI] =0.82) when domain items were combined into physical-psychological, social, and environmental superitems. Analysis of shorter versions, the EUROHIS-QOL-8 and World Health Organization Quality of Life-5 (WHOQOL-5), indicated overall acceptable fit to the Rasch model and evidence of unidimensionality. The EUROHIS-QOL-8 showed good reliability (PSI=0.81); however, reliability of the WHOQOL-5 (PSI=0.68) was below acceptable standards for group comparisons, in addition to demonstrating poor person-item targeting. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the 8-item EUROHIS-QOL-8 version are both reliable and valid in the assessment of quality of life in both injury and general populations. Ordinal-interval conversion tables published for these validated scales as well as for the WHOQOL-5 can be used to improve precision of assessment. The transformation of ordinal scale scores into an interval measure of health-related quality of life also permits the calculation of a single summary score for the WHOQOL-BREF, which will be useful in a wide range of clinical and research contexts. Further validation work of the WHOQOL-5 is needed to ascertain its psychometric properties.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]