These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Volume acceleration as an index of neuromuscular output.
    Author: Cotton DJ, Sheiban M, Engel LA.
    Journal: Respir Physiol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 3124233.
    Abstract:
    At the transition from expiration to inspiration, when flow and volume changes are small, changes in the respiratory system driving pressure could determine the degree of volume acceleration (AI), which, in turn, could reflect the degree of respiratory center output. To test this hypothesis, we calculated AI occurring in each respiratory cycle at the transition from expiration to inspiration during CO2 rebreathing in 4 healthy supine subjects. To minimize the flow and volume change over the measurement interval, we measured AI just prior to inspiration within the limits of an expiratory flow of 0.2 L . sec -1 to zero flow using digital differentiation. We also measured mouth pressure 100 msec after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) during intermittent transient inspiratory airway occlusions. During CO2 rebreathing AI increased significantly with both increasing PCO2 and P0.1. We also compared pairs of rebreathing studies, performed without and with an alinear (16 cm H2O . L -1 . sec -1) inspiratory resistor (IR), repeated twice in the 4 subjects. IR markedly decreased delta VE/delta PCO2 and the slope of the increase in mean inspiratory flow rate with PCO2 (delta VT/TI/delta PCO2) but did not significantly alter either delta AI/delta PCO2 or the increase in P0.1 with PCO2 (delta P0.1/delta PCO2). However, the effects of IR on AI and P0.1 differed between the early and late phases of each rebreathing run; early in the rebreathing runs (PCO2 = 55 Torr) IR increased both AI and P0.1 by a similar amount, but near the end of rebreathing (PCO2 = 60 Torr) IR increased P0.1 but not AI. Our results are consistent with the possibility that AI reflects neuromuscular output under the conditions of the study. Hence this approach justifies further evaluation to determine its general applicability.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]