These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Author: Qin B, Zhao J, Li M, Yao P, Zhou X.
    Journal: BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun 27; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 31248387.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism greater than - 10 D, and - 10 D or less respectively. METHODS: 60 eyes/patients were equally selected into group 1 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of - 10 D or less) and group 2 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of over - 10 D), both of which were treated with SMILE. Visual and refractive outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions were evaluated preoperatively, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of group 1 and group 2 was - 0.069 ± 0.047 and - 0.053 ± 0.073 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.48). 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were within 1 D of targeted correction (P = 0.45). Meanwhile, 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (P = 0.20). Changes in corneal higher-order aberrations root mean square, coma, and trefoil were similar between the two groups but spherical aberration was higher in group 2 (P < 0.01). Micro-distortions were observed in 53% in group 1 and 77% in group 2. More micro-distortions were observed in group 2 (3.40 ± 2.66) than in group 1 (2.07 ± 2.29) (P = 0.041). The total number of micro-distortions was not correlated with postoperative CDVA (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes showed similar results of SMILE for myopic correction of > - 10 D and ≤ - 10 D. Refractive outcomes showed slightly under-correction in higher myopic eyes. Higher myopic treatment tends to induce more spherical aberrations. Micro-distortions had no impact in visual and refractive outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]