These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Author: Servant M, Logan GD.
    Journal: Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363.
    Abstract:
    Eriksen and Eriksen (Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149, 1974) explained the flanker compatibility effect in terms of response competition. A simplified version of the original flanker task, featuring a 1-to-1 mapping of stimuli onto responses, has become prominent in the literature. Compatible flanker trials present identical items (HHHHH), whereas incompatible trials present different items (HHSHH). The 1-to-1 mapping is potentially problematic because it invites a strategy that people could use to perform the task. Subjects could first determine whether all the items are the same and focus attention on the central target only if they are not. Response times (RTs) would be longer for incompatible trials partly because they require the extra step of focusing attention. We tested this conditional focusing hypothesis by combining a 1-to-1 flanker task with a digit probe detection procedure. In half of the trials, the digit '7' appeared immediately after the response to the flanker display, at the target or a flanker location. Three experiments showed a V-shaped function of RTs to digits across locations that was not modulated by flanker compatibility. These results demonstrate that subjects focused attention on the central target regardless of the same/different configuration of the display, refuting the conditional focusing hypothesis. Our findings support Eriksen and Eriksen's original interpretation of the flanker task.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]