These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker.
    Author: Tellum T, Matic GV, Dormagen JB, Nygaard S, Viktil E, Qvigstad E, Lieng M.
    Journal: Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6971-6981. PubMed ID: 31264010.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a junctional zone (JZ) thickness of ≥ 12 mm and morphological features of the JZ in MRI in diagnosing adenomyosis in a premenopausal study population. METHODS: This single-center, prospective observational study consecutively enrolled 93 premenopausal women suffering from a benign gynecological condition, from September 2014 to August 2016. Institutional review board approval and written consent were obtained. All participants underwent MRI and hysterectomy with a histopathological examination. MR images were evaluated in a blinded fashion by two independent readers. The maximum junctional zone thickness (JZmax), presence of JZmax ≥ 12 mm, and any irregular appearance of the JZ (defined as irregular outer or inner borders, focal thickening, presence of high-intensity signal foci, or fingerlike indentations at the inner border) were documented, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated with the AUC, chi-square test, and multiple regression. RESULTS: Adenomyosis was histopathologically confirmed in 57 (61%) of the women. JZmax was not positively correlated with adenomyosis diagnosis (AUC = 0.57, p = 0.26) and did not differ significantly between those with and without adenomyosis (10.3 vs 10.1 mm, p = 0.88), nor was a cutoff of JZmax ≥ 12 mm (n = 30/57 (53%) vs n = 16/36 (44%), p = 0.29). The presence of an irregular JZ showed the best association with adenomyosis among the evaluated signs (sensitivity 74% (95% CI, 60, 85); specificity 83% (95% CI, 67, 94) (p < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: JZmax was not correlated with adenomyosis in the present premenopausal study population, but direct signs of adenomyosis such as irregularities of the JZ provided a good diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Measuring the junctional zone thickness is of limited value for diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI and should not be used for diagnosing adenomyosis in premenopausal women with moderate disease severity. • An irregular appearance of the junctional zone, the presence of myometrial cysts, and adenomyoma appear to provide the highest specificity for diagnosing adenomyosis. • A consensus for the definition and reading of the junctional zone is needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]