These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Adaptation in the auditory system of a beluga whale: effect of adapting sound parameters.
    Author: Popov VV, Supin AY, Nechaev DI, Sysueva EV.
    Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Oct; 205(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 31280359.
    Abstract:
    The effects of adapting sounds (pip trains or pure tones) on auditory evoked potentials (the rate following response, RFR) were investigated in a beluga whale. During RFR acquisition, adapting signals lasting 128 ms each were alternated with test signals lasting 16 ms each; the test signal levels varied randomly. Adapting signals were trains of cosine-enveloped tone pips or pure tones. Pip rate varied with the envelope cosine cycle maintained at 0.125 of pip intervals and the cosine rise-fall time maintained at 0.0625 of pip intervals. Adapting signals shifted the amplitude-level function upward compared to the baseline (no adapting signal) function. The higher the adapting signal level was, the bigger the shift in the amplitude-level function was. The slower the pips were in the adapting signal, the smaller the adaptation effect was. A train of pips with a 0.0625-ms rise-fall time and 125 dB SPL shifted the function by 35-40 dB, whereas a train of pips with a 1-ms rise-fall time or a pure tone with the same SPL shifted the function by approximately 15 dB. The difference between the "fast" and "slow" adapting signals is supposed to be associated with their abilities to stimulate the auditory system in odontocetes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]