These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Evaluation of the effectiveness of foetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic preterm labour women. Author: Jun SY, Lee JY, Kim HM, Kim MJ, Cha HH, Seong WJ. Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jul 11; 19(1):241. PubMed ID: 31296172. Abstract: BACKGROUND: The prediction of preterm birth (PTB) is important in the management of symptomatic preterm labour women. We evaluated the effectiveness of the foetal fibronectin (fFN) test for predicting PTB in symptomatic preterm labour women with consideration of physiologic changes in cervical length (CL) during pregnancy. METHODS: This prospective study included 85 women with symptomatic preterm labour of a singleton pregnancy. Positive fFN was defined as a fFN level of > 50 ng/mL in cervicovaginal secretion, while a short CL was defined as that below 25th percentile at the corresponding gestational age. We evaluated effectiveness of the fFN test, CL, and the combination of these two tests, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) to predict the PTB within 7 and 14 days of testing and PTB at < 34 and 37 weeks of gestation. We also present the odds ratios (ORs) of the test results, defining the women with both negative results as the reference group. RESULTS: Of the 85 women, 31 (36.5%) showed a positive fFN and 44 (51.8%) had a short CL. PTB occurred within 7 and 14 days of testing and before 34 and 37 weeks of gestation in 17.6, 20.0, 23.5 and 49.4% of the women, respectively. The fFN and CL results showed low predictive effectiveness for the studied outcomes with LR+ (fFN, 1.5-1.9; CL, 1.0-1.5) and LR- (fFN, 0.7; CL, 0.7-0.9). The combined use of fFN and CL could not improve these results (LR+, 1.4-2.3; LR-, 0.7-0.9). However, the risk of PTB before 37 weeks was increased in women with positive fFN but not CL shortening compared to the reference group (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.3). The risk of PTB before 34 weeks was increased in both positive fFN and CL compared to the reference group (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 1.9-34.5). CONCLUSION: Although, our approach could not improve the ability to predict PTB, it could identify women at risk for delivery before 34 or 37 weeks of gestation. Therefore, it could be used to manage women with symptomatic preterm labour.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]