These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: High red blood cell distribution width is closely associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris.
    Author: Geng N, Su G, Wang S, Zou D, Pang W, Sun Y.
    Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Jul 24; 19(1):175. PubMed ID: 31340761.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis remains an unresolved issue. Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the process of in-stent restenosis. Significant and positive associations were found between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and inflammation. But whether there is a close relationship between higher RDW and in-stent restenosis is still not clarified. METHODS: This retrospective observational study investigated 214 consecutive patients with unstable angina pectoris who underwent successful percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents. Patients were divided into three groups according to baseline RDW before percutaneous coronary interventions (low RDW group:≤12.5%; intermediate RDW group:> 12.5% and ≤ 13.5%; high RDW group:> 13.5%). The follow-up angiographies were routinely performed 9-12 months after the initial percutaneous coronary interventions. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the independent predictors of in-stent restenosis. RESULTS: The in-stent restenosis rate was significantly higher in group with higher baseline RDW value (12.3, 19.7, 47.7% in low, intermediate, and high RDW groups respectively, P < 0.001). The baseline RDWs were significantly higher in patients with in-stent restenosis compared with those in patients without in-stent restenosis (13.7 ± 0.8% vs. 13.0 ± 0.8%, P < 0.001). For prediction of in-stent restenosis, the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis demonstrated the optimal RDW cutoff value was 13.37 (sensitivity: 65.5%, specificity: 73.6%); the diagnosis cutoff value was 13.89 (sensitivity: 40.0%, specificity: 91.8%); the screening cutoff value was 12.99 (sensitivity: 83.6%, specificity: 49.1%). By multivariate logistic analysis, higher baseline RDW (odds ratio [OR], 5.179; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.568 to 10.446; P<0.001) together with lower baseline indirect bilirubin (OR, 0.413; 95% CI, 0.305 to 0.559; P<0.001) and diabetes (OR, 4.077; 95% CI, 1.654 to 10.054; P = 0.002) were closely associated with in-stent restenosis at followup (11.1 ± 5.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: The baseline RDW was closely associated with in-stent restenosis at follow-up. The patients with higher baseline RDW might have more chances to develop in-stent restenosis at followup.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]