These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Treatment of prostatic cancer with intranasal administration of LHRH analog, Buserelin (Hoe 766) study of the optimum dosage of intranasal application]. Author: Niijima T, Kishimoto T, Shimazaki J, Yoshida O, Isurugi K. Journal: Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Jul; 34(7):1309-19. PubMed ID: 3140622. Abstract: Patients with pathologically defined prostatic carcinoma (114 cases in 23 institutes) were subcutaneously administered 500 micrograms of Buserelin (Hoe 766) 3 times a day for 7 consecutive days, then randomized to intranasally administered 600 or 900 micrograms/day of Buserelin as maintenance treatment. We examined the clinical efficacy, safety and endocrinological effects of the drug by the intranasal dosage. Size of prostate decreased more than 25% in 21 cases (total 47 cases; measured at the start and 3 months treatment by ultrasonography. Complete response and partial response were observed in 13 cases (16.1%) by NPCP's criteria at 3 months Buserelin treatment. Grobal Improvement Rating (GIR) were respectively 64.3% (600 micrograms group) and 68.0% (900 micrograms group). Grobal Utility Rating (GUR) were respectively 85.7% (600 micrograms group) and 82.0% (900 micrograms group). No significance was observed in these two groups. Adverse reactions were observed in 21 cases (18.9%). Except in 1 case, they were slight and the Buserelin treatment could be continued. Objectively Safety Rating (OSR) was 92.8%. Five cases were treated for more than 2 years with Buserelin and these cases were well controlled. Buserelin was considered as an effective and safe drug to treat prostatic carcinoma.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]