These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validation and method comparison of the use of densitometry to quantify monoclonal proteins in canine sera.
    Author: Harris AD, Rout E, Avery A, Bolte D, Belling-Kelly E, Moore AR.
    Journal: Vet Clin Pathol; 2019 Oct; 48 Suppl 1():78-87. PubMed ID: 31410878.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Densitometric quantitation using serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is used to monitor monoclonal proteins (M-proteins) in human patients but has not been validated in the dog. Serum globulin concentrations, species-specific radial immunodiffusion (RID), and ELISAs are currently used in veterinary medicine. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare four methods that quantify M-proteins using densitometry and biuret protein (dM-protein) measurements. We also validated the best performing method and compared it with the RID and ELISA methods for measuring canine serum M-protein. METHOD: Serum from six normal dogs and 83 serum samples from 46 dogs with confirmed monoclonal gammopathies were used. A spike and recovery experiment with purified monoclonal IgG and IgM, inter-run and intra-run variability, linearity under dilution, and lower limit of detection were performed. Results of commercial canine RID and ELISA kits for total class-specific immunoglobulin were compared with dM-proteins. RESULTS: The corrected perpendicular drop gating method had <20% error for IgG/γ-globulin and IgM/β-globulin M-protein quantifications. Linearity (r > .99), intra-run CV (1.1%-2.3%), and inter-run CVs (2.0%-3.5%) were acceptable. Correlation between the RID and densitometry results ranged from r = .25 to r = .88, depending on the class. The RID result was greater than that of the biuret total protein in 26/63 (41%) IgA cases. A panel of IgG, IgA, and IgM RIDs failed to correctly identify an IgM paraproteinemia in 6/6 (100%) cases. Densitometry was not comparable with any other tested method. CONCLUSION: Densitometric quantitation is a valid technique for measuring M-proteins in the β- and γ-globulin regions. Immunotyping via RID using the tested kit does not appear to detect IgM. Densitometry is recommended for measuring M-proteins in canine patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]