These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coil Embolization of a Carotid-Cavernous Fistula Through Superior Ophthalmic Venous Access via External Jugular Vein Puncture Approach.
    Author: Gomez-Paz S, Vergara-Garcia D, Robinson M, Kicielinski KP, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS.
    Journal: World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():196. PubMed ID: 31421303.
    Abstract:
    Carotid-cavernous fistulas are vascular malformations that pose a risk for intracranial hemorrhage when there is documented cortical venous drainage. When possible, treatment with transvenous embolization has become the technique of choice since the late 1990s.1,2 We present a case of a patient with a carotid-cavernous fistula treated with venous coil embolization via a jugular venous approach. The patient was a 59-year-old female with a history of intense headaches. Initial magnetic resonance imaging showed congestion in the right cavernous sinus, and a diagnostic angiogram revealed a cavernous carotid fistula Thomas type 4.3,4 Given the presence of retrograde cortical venous drainage, we decided to treat the lesion. A femoral route for endovascular treatment was attempted, but it was unsuccessful in traversing the external jugular vein due to venous valves. We accessed the fistula through a direct puncture direct proximal approach,5 from the external jugular vein making our trajectory through the facial-angular-supraorbital vein, ultimately reaching the cavernous sinus. We then filled the sinus with coils to obliterate the fistula. The patient awakened neurologically intact, and a postoperative angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the lesion. The patient was discharged at postoperative day 1 without complications. In this video, we narrate the important details of this alternative when a traditional route is inaccessible (Video 1). Informed consent was obtained for the case illustrated; however, neither Institutional Review Board nor patient consent is required for the report of a single case in which no identifiable patient information is shared.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]