These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Altered syntactic abilities in first episode patients: An inner phenomenon characterizing psychosis.
    Author: Delvecchio G, Caletti E, Perlini C, Siri FM, Andreella A, Finos L, Bellani M, Fabbro F, Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, Cristofalo D, Scocco P, D'Agostino A, Torresani S, Imbesi M, Bellini F, Veronese A, Bressi C, Ruggeri M, Brambilla P, GET UP Group.
    Journal: Eur Psychiatry; 2019 Sep; 61():119-126. PubMed ID: 31442739.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Research has consistently shown that language abilities represent a core dimension of psychosis; however, to date, very little is known about syntactic comprehension performance in the early stages of psychosis. This study aims to compare the linguistic abilities involved in syntactic comprehension in a large group of First Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: A multiple choice test of comprehension of syntax was administered to 218 FEP patients (166 non-affective FEP patients [FEP-NA] and 52 affective FEP patients [FEP-A]) and 106 HCs. All participants were asked to match a sentence they listen with one out of four vignettes on a pc screen. Only one vignette represents the stimulus target, while the others are grammatical or non-grammatical (visual) distractors. Both grammatical and non-grammatical errors and performance in different syntactic constructions were considered. RESULTS: FEP committed greater number of errors in the majority of TCGB language domains compared to HCs. Moreover, FEP-NA patients committed significantly more non-grammatical (z = -3.2, p = 0.007), locative (z = -4.7, p < 0.001), passive-negative (z = -3.2, p = 0.02), and relative (z = -4.6, p < 0.001) errors compared to HCs as well as more passive-affirmative errors compared to both HCs (z = -4.3, p < 0.001) and FEP-A (z = 3.1, p = 0.04). Finally, we also found that both FEP-NA and FEP-A committed more grammatical (FEP-NA: z = -9.2, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = -4.4, p < 0.001), total (FEP-NA: z = -8.2, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = 3.9, p =  0.002), and active-negative (FEP-NA: z = -5.8, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = -3.5, p = 0.01) errors compared to HCs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the access to syntactic structures is already impaired in FEP patients, especially in those with FEP-NA, ultimately suggesting that language impairments represent a core and inner feature of psychosis even at early stages.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]