These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Author: Summanen P, Jousimies-Somer H.
    Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 3145860.
    Abstract:
    This study evaluated RapID ANA and API 20 A systems for identification of anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria isolated from oral and non-oral infections using standard reference methods. A total of 480 isolates were tested in both systems. The RapID ANA system correctly identified 74% of the strains to species level and 17.5% to genus level; 5% were misidentified. The API 20 A system correctly identified 50% of the strains to species level and 24.5% to genus level; 8% were misidentified and 17.5% could not be identified by the API 20 A system.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]