These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Molar inclination and surrounding alveolar bone change relative to the design of bone-borne maxillary expanders: A CBCT study.
    Author: Moon HW, Kim MJ, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Chung KR, Nelson G.
    Journal: Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31461306.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molar inclination and skeletal and alveolar bone changes when comparing tooth bone-borne (MSE) and tissue bone-borne type maxillary expanders (C-expander) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in late adolescence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 48 late-adolescent patients were divided into two groups according to the type of expander: MSE group (n = 24, age = 19.2 ± 5.9 years) and C-expander group (n = 24, age = 18.1 ± 4.5 years). CBCT scans were taken before treatment and 3 months after expansion. Transverse skeletal and dental expansion, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, buccal alveolar bone height, thickness, dehiscence, and fenestration were evaluated on the maxillary first molar. Paired t-test, independent t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. RESULTS: The MSE group produced greater dental expansion (P < .05), whereas skeletal expansion was similar in both groups (P = .859). The C expander group had more alveolar bone inclination change (P < .01), and the MSE group had more buccal tipping of the anchorage teeth (P < .01 or .001). Buccal alveolar bone height loss and thickness changes were greater in the MSE group (P < .01 or <.001). Formation of dehiscences was more frequent in the MSE group (P < .001), whereas for fenestrations, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Buccal bone height loss in the MSE group had a negative correlation with initial buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of teeth into bone-borne expanders resulted in an increase in the severity of side effects. For patients in late adolescence, tissue bone-borne expanders offer comparable skeletal effects to tooth bone-borne expanders, with fewer dentoalveolar side effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]