These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
    Author: Bashir R, Sonar S, Batra P, Srivastava A, Singla A.
    Journal: Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, the change in the transverse maxillary arch dimensions, in patients requiring all first premolar extractions when using Active and Passive Self-ligating brackets, and comparing them with Conventional brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a non-blinded randomised clinical trial, which consisted of 42 patients (21 males and 21 females) within the age group of 16-25 years, having bimaxillary protrusion. They were divided into three groups with 14 patients each. In Group 1 - Conventional brackets (3M Unitek), in Group 2 - Passive Self-ligation brackets: Smart Clip (3M Unitek), and in Group 3 - Active Self-ligation brackets: Empower AO (American Orthodontics) were bonded. All brackets had MBT prescription and 0.02" slot size. Dental study models were taken before the start of treatment and after six months of retraction. Inter-canine and intermolar widths were measured in all the three groups in the above mentioned stages. RESULTS: As compared to Conventional brackets, Self-ligating brackets (Passive and Active) showed greater increase in the transverse arch widths. Furthermore, between Passive and Active Self-ligating brackets, Passive Self-ligating brackets - Smart Clip (Group 2) showed a greater increment in the transverse arch dimensions, with an increase of 4.89mm in the inter-canine width and 3.4mm in intermolar width. CONCLUSION: Significant difference was found between Self-ligating brackets and the Conventional bracket system regarding maxillary arch width dimensional changes. Passive Self-ligating brackets - Smart Clip (Group 2) showed the highest and inter-molar width increase.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]