These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
    Author: Durmuş Y, Karalök A, Başaran D, Kamani MO, Boran N, Koç S, Turan AT.
    Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755.
    Abstract:
    We designed this study to evaluate any factors associated with positive surgical margin in conisation specimens and to determine the optimal cone size. The medical records of patients who had undergone a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), cold-knife conisation (CKC) and needle excision of the transformation zone (NETZ) procedure were reviewed retrospectively. Two hundred and sixty eight women fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Univariate analyses showed that 'postmenopause', 'HSIL on smear', 'previous colposcopic examination revealing HSIL in endocervical curettage (ECC) material and in two or more ectocervical quadrants' and 'managing with LEEP' were significant predictors of surgical margin positivity. Nulliparous patients showed significantly lower rate of surgical margin positivity. 'Postmenopause', 'previous colposcopic examination revealing HSIL in ECC material and in two or more ectocervical quadrants' and 'HSIL on smear' were identified as independent predictors of surgical margin positivity according to multivariate analyses.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Previous studies demonstrated 'menopause', 'Age ≥50', 'managing with LEEP', 'disease involving >2/3 of cervix at visual inspection', 'training level of the surgeon', 'cytology squamous cell carcinoma' and 'mean cone height' as factors associated with positive surgical margin in conisation specimens.What do the results of this study add? In our study, univariate analyses showed that 'postmenopause', 'HSIL on smear', 'previous colposcopic examination revealing HSIL in endocervical curettage material and in two or more ectocervical quadrants' and 'managing with LEEP' were associated with surgical margin positivity. On the other hand, nulliparous women showed significantly lower rate of surgical margin positivity compared with parous women. Multivariate analyses showed that 'postmenopause', 'previous colposcopic examination revealing HSIL in endocervical curettage material and in two or more ectocervical quadrants' and 'HSIL on smear' were independent predictors of surgical margin positivity in conisation specimens.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We can predict high-risk patients with regard to surgical margin positivity. Prediction of high-risk patients and management with a tailored approach may help minimise surgical margin positivity rates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]