These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A New Diagnostic Medium for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Dynamic Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.
    Author: Qi Q, Huang S, Ling Z, Chen Y, Hu H, Zhan P, Zhang B, Zou X, Peng X.
    Journal: World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e225-e232. PubMed ID: 31493599.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To identify and reveal the sensitivity and efficiency of dynamic somatosensory evoked potentials (DSSEPs) in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 CSM and 15 control patients. All patients received SSEP examination with stimulation of median and ulnar nerves at neutral, flexed, and extended cervical positions; latency and amplitude were recorded at the C2 and C5 spinous processes and in the scalp over the primary sensory area (C3'/4'). The percentage changes in latency and amplitude with dynamic motion were examined for each lead and compared between groups; the diagnostic cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: All the patients with CSM received surgeries and were followed up for 1 year. Amplitude parameters varied with a dynamic position in both groups; all recorded dynamic SSEP indices except right median stimulus recorded at C5 spinous process, right ulnar stimulus recorded at scalp point C3, and right ulnar stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process were significantly different between groups (P < 0.05), but latency was not (P > 0.05). At the neutral position, the amplitude of left media stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process (LMC2) was associated with CSM, but with low diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.199). At a dynamic position, the percentage change in amplitude of LMC2 and of left ulnar stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process (LUC2) were determined to be diagnostic of CSM (P < 0.05), with areas under the curve of 0.891 and 0.912, respectively. Both records had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of CSM; the diagnostic cutoff values of LMC2 and LUC2 were calculated as 10.2% and 19.25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage change in amplitude was obvious during cervical dynamic motion, with records from LMC2 and LUC2 being predictive of CSM diagnosis; dynamic SSEPs provided a simple, accurate, and noninvasive supplementary test for the diagnosis of complicated CSM.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]