These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: P-CPOT: An Adaptation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients.
    Author: Tao H, Galagarza SR.
    Journal: Pain Manag Nurs; 2020 Apr; 21(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 31506237.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Critical-Care Observation Tool (P-CPOT) is an adaption of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) originally designed to assess pain in nonverbal critically-ill adults. AIM: The study validated the P-CPOT in assessing nociceptive procedure pain in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) children who are unable to verbalize pain. METHODS: Content validity was tested using a two-round expert panel review with 8 experts. With a sample of 78 PICU patients, prospective repeated measures were designed to detect the change over time at pre- (T1), during (T2), and post- (T3) for routinely scheduled nociceptive procedures. Each measure was independently completed by two raters using two scales, the P-CPOT and the FLACC (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability). RESULTS: All categories had Item-level content validity indices of 0.88 to 1.00. A one-factor structure containing 5 items was established and accounted for 85% variance in P-CPOT scores. Inter-rater reliability was substantial with correlation coefficient of 0.996 and Kappa value of 0.90. A threshold value of 4 resulted in excellent balance between sensitivity (98.6%) and specificity (97.6%). Both tools detected the score changes over time (p = .025). P-CPOT had a larger effect size (Cohen's d = 4.1) as well as a higher score than FLACC at T2 (p = .039). Linear regression revealed that patients being ventilated tended to have a P-CPOT score of 1.1 higher than the FLACC score while controlling for heart rates (p < .001), meaning that P-CPOT is more sensitive than FLACC for detecting pain increase during nociceptive procedures in ventilated patients. CONCLUSION: The P-CPOT is a valid scale for assessing pain in PICU patients with very good psychometric performance. It is especially adept in detecting pain in ventilated patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]