These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of needle tip tracking on procedural time of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block: a randomised controlled trial.
    Author: Kåsine T, Romundstad L, Rosseland LA, Ullensvang K, Fagerland MW, Kessler P, Bjørnå E, Sauter AR.
    Journal: Anaesthesia; 2020 Jan; 75(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 31506918.
    Abstract:
    Technology that facilitates performance of deep peripheral nerve blocks is of clinical interest. The Onvision™ is a new device for ultrasonographic needle tip tracking that incorporates an ultrasound sensor on the needle tip that is then represented by a green circle on the ultrasound screen. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of needle tip tracking on procedural time in the first human volunteer study. Secondary outcome measures included: number of hand movements; hand movement path length; block success rate; block onset time; block duration; discomfort experienced by the volunteers; and the anaesthetists' confidence as to whether their block would be successful. Two anaesthetists performed ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks with an out-of-plane technique, with and without the use of needle tip tracking. In total, data from 25 volunteers were studied. Mean (SD) procedural time was 163 (103) s with needle tip tracking and 216 (117) s without (p = 0.10). Hand motion analysis showed that needle tip tracking was associated with a significant decrease in the mean (SD) number of intended needling hand movements (39 (29) vs. 59 (36); p = 0.03) and path lengths (3.2 (3.1) m vs. 5.5 (4.5) m; p = 0.03). No differences were found for any other secondary outcomes. The use of Onvision needle tip tracking did not reduce procedural time for out-of-plane ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block but did reduce the number of hand movements and path lengths. This may indicate improved needle control but further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]