These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Acticoat versus biobrane: a retrospective review on the treatment of paediatric mid-dermal torso burns.
    Author: Selvarajah D, Bollu BK, Harvey J, Jacques M, Jehangir S, Fuller ES, La Hei E, Bertinetti M, Lawrence T, Holland AJ.
    Journal: Int J Burns Trauma; 2019; 9(4):82-87. PubMed ID: 31523483.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Scalds involving toddlers commonly involve the torso and are frequently mid-dermal in depth. Initial management of a mid-dermal burn is conservative, progressing to grafting if healing has not been achieved in 10-14 days. Historically BiobraneTM (UDL Laboratories, Inc., Sugar Land, TX) is thought to have more favourable clinical outcomes compared to Acticoat TM (Smith and Nephew, St. Petersburg, Fl, USA). The Burns Unit at The Children's Hospital at Westmead (CHW) uses both dressings on a regular basis, providing the opportunity to compare the results of the dressings in a cohort of patients with mid-dermal torso burns. METHOD: A retrospective review was undertaken of all paediatric mid-dermal torso burns admitted to CHW between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcomes analysed were: time to complete healing and the need for grafting. Secondary outcomes included: operating theatre time, clinic visits, length of stay in hospital and positive wound swab colonisation. RESULTS: 78 children met the study criteria, 64 (82%) in the Acticoat group and 14 (18%) in the Biobrane group. 36 out of 78 children (56%) in the Acticoat group had their burns spontaneously healed without the need of skin graft surgery, compared with 10 out of 14 children (71%) in the Biobrane group. The days to complete healing were quicker in the Acticoat group (13 days) compared to the Biobrane group (17 days), although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.3). Overall patients managed with the Biobrane dressing required more operative sessions under general anaesthesia, a longer hospital stay, more clinic visits and a higher number of positive wound swab colonisation with heavy growth compared to the Acticoat group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the use of the Biobrane dressing does not significantly improve the clinical outcomes of mid-dermal torso burns in children compared to the Acticoat dressing. Acticoat reduced healing time, decreased the requirements for a general anaesthesia, reduced inpatient hospital stay and risk of infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]