These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comprehensive lipidomics of mouse plasma using class-specific surrogate calibrants and SWATH acquisition for large-scale lipid quantification in untargeted analysis.
    Author: Drotleff B, Illison J, Schlotterbeck J, Lukowski R, Lämmerhofer M.
    Journal: Anal Chim Acta; 2019 Dec 04; 1086():90-102. PubMed ID: 31561798.
    Abstract:
    Lipidomics has gained rising attention in recent years. Several strategies for lipidomic profiling have been developed, with targeted analysis of selected lipid species, typically utilized for lipid quantification by low-resolution triple quadrupole MS/MS, and untargeted analysis by high-resolution MS instruments, focusing on hypothesis generation for prognostic, diagnostic and/or disease-relevant biomarker discovery. The latter methodologies generally yield relative quantification data with limited inter-assay comparability. In this work we aimed to combine untargeted analysis and absolute quantification to enhance data quality and to obtain independent results for optimum comparability to previous studies or database entries. For the lipidomic analysis of mouse plasma, RP-UHPLC hyphenated to a high-resolution quadrupole TOF mass spectrometer in comprehensive data-independent SWATH acquisition mode was employed. This way, quantifiable data on the MS and the MS/MS level were recorded, which increases assay specificity and quantitative performance. Due to the lack of an appropriate blank matrix for untargeted lipidomics, we herein established a sophisticated strategy for lipid class-specific calibration with stable isotope labeled standards (surrogate calibrants). LLOQs were in the range between 10 and 50 ng mL-1 for LPC, LPE, PI, PS, PG, SM, PC, PE, DAG) or 100-700 ng mL-1 (MAG, TAG), except for cholesterol and CE (1-20 μg mL-1). Acceptable values for accuracy and precision well below ±15% bias were reached for the majority of surrogate calibrants. However, to achieve sufficient accuracy for target lipids, response factors to corresponding surrogate calibrants are required. An approach to estimate response factors via a standard reference material (NIST SRM 1950) was therefore conducted. Furthermore, a useful workflow for post-acquisition re-calibration, involving response factor determination and iteratively built libraries, is suggested. In comparison to single-point calibration, the presented surrogate calibrant method was shown to yield results with improved accuracy that are largely in accordance with standard addition. Quantitative results of real samples (high-fat diet vs control diet) were then compared to two previously published dietary mouse plasma studies that provided absolute lipid levels and showed similar trends.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]