These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Google fit smartphone application or Gt3X Actigraph: Which is better for detecting the stepping activity of individuals with stroke? A validity study. Author: Polese JC, E Faria GS, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Lima LP, Coelho de Morais Faria CD, Scianni AA, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Journal: J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2019 Jul; 23(3):461-465. PubMed ID: 31563356. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of the GT3X® ActiGraph accelerometer and the Google Fit® smartphone application in estimating stepping activity in people with chronic stroke. METHODS: Thirty-seven stroke survivors walked along a straight, 10 metre hallway over 5 min at their fastest speeds, wearing the GT3X® ActiGraph accelerometer and a smartphone on their paretic lower limb. The criterion-standard measurement made was the actual number of steps, counted by a trained examiner. RESULTS: The mean estimated steps measured by the GT3X® ActiGraph and Google Fit® respectively were 276.7 ± 97.6 and 481.0 ± 119.8; that calculated from the examiner's measurements was 472.0 ± 93.9. Statistically significant associations were found between the actual steps and those estimated by the GT3X® ActiGraph (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) and Google Fit® (r = 0.89; p < 0.001). The Google Fit® application demonstrated the highest reliability coefficient (ICC[2,1] = 0.93; p < 0.001; p = 0.37), compared to that of the GT3X® ActiGraph (ICC[2,1] = 0.32; p < 0.001; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The GT3X® ActiGraph underestimated the data and may not be the most appropriate device to estimate the stepping activity of stroke patients. The findings support the validity of a smartphone application in estimating the stepping activity of individuals with stroke, when worn on the paretic side.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]