These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Impact of Hospice on Spending and Utilization Among Patients With Lung Cancer in Medicare. Author: Kalidindi Y, Segel J, Jung J. Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2020 Apr; 37(4):286-293. PubMed ID: 31564110. Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare patterns and understand drivers of spending and utilization by month in the last 6 months of life between patients with lung cancer who used hospice versus those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using 2009 to 2013 Medicare claims. METHODS: We used a 10% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with lung cancer who died between 2010 and 2013 (43 789 beneficiaries). Patients were assigned to 2 groups depending on whether they used hospice care in the last 6 months of life. The following outcomes were constructed by month: (1) all-cause Medicare spending, (2) indicator of hospitalization, (3) indicator of emergency department (ED) visit, (4) number of part B chemotherapy claims, and (5) number of radiation therapy sessions. We used a combination of propensity score matching and regression analysis to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients who used hospice had significantly lower spending in the last month of life compared to nonusers (US$16 907 vs US$26 906, P < .00). The spending differences in the last month of life between the 2 groups were largely driven by lower likelihood of hospitalization (54% vs 80%, P < .01) and ED visits (15% vs 22%, P < .01) and fewer chemotherapy (0.12 vs 0.32, P < .01) and radiation therapy sessions (0.80 vs 1.26, P < .01). During the other months in the 6-month period, spending was similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Timely hospice enrollment of patients with lung cancer-the group suffering from high morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer-may lead to significant cost savings.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]