These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Personalised Nutrition Technologies and Innovations: A Cross-National Survey of Registered Dietitians.
    Author: Abrahams M, Frewer LJ, Bryant E, Stewart-Knox B.
    Journal: Public Health Genomics; 2019; 22(3-4):119-131. PubMed ID: 31597141.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Commercial technology-enabled personalised nutrition is undergoing rapid growth, yet its uptake in dietetics practice remains low. This survey sought the opinions of dietetics practitioners on personalised nutrition and related technologies to understand the facilitators and barriers to its application in practice. METHOD: A cross-section of registered dietitians were recruited in the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Israel, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, and South Africa. The questionnaire sought their views on the risks of genetics technology, the ethics of genetic testing, the usefulness of new personalised nutrition technologies, entrepreneurism, and the perceived importance of new technologies to dietetics. Validated scales were included to assess personality (Big Five) and self-efficacy (NGSEI). The survey was available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the integration of nutrigenetic testing into practice, and to identify factors associated with the perceived importance of bio-information, and mobile technology to dietetics practice. RESULTS: A total of 323 responses (response rate 19.7%) were analysed. Dietetics practitioners who had integrated personalised nutrition technology into practice perceived technologies to be less risky (p = 0.02), biotechnology to be more important (p < 0.01), and professional skills to be less important (p = 0.04) than those who had not. They were also more likely to see themselves as entrepreneurs (p < 0.01) and to perceive lower risks to be associated with technology (p < 0.01). Practitioners of nutrigenetics were lower on neuroticism (p < 0.01) and higher on self-efficacy (p < 0.01), extraversion (p < 0.01), and agreeableness (p < 0.01). A higher perceived importance of biotechnology to dietetics practice was associated with higher perceived usefulness of omics tests (p < 0.01). Perceived importance of information technology was associated with the perceived importance of biotechnology (p < 0.01). Mobile technology was perceived as important by dietitians with the highest level of education (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For dietitians to practice technology-enabled personalised nutrition, training will be required to enhance self-efficacy, address the risks perceived to be associated with new technologies, and instil an entrepreneurial mindset.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]