These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Protocol-driven multidetector SPECT/CT: integration of hybrid imaging into the routine workflow of whole-body bone scintigraphy in oncology patients. Author: Adusumilli P, Nejadhamzeeigilani H, Pitts K, McDermott G, Scarsbrook AF, Vaidyanathan S, Patel CN, Chowdhury FU. Journal: Clin Radiol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):79.e1-79.e7. PubMed ID: 31601386. Abstract: AIM: To analyse the additional clinical value of protocol-driven and selective use of multidetector single-photon-emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in oncology patients undergoing whole-body bone scintigraphy (BS) and to analyse reporter confidence in diagnosis with and without SPECT/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 2,954 whole-body BS examinations were performed in oncology patients, with 444 (15%) undergoing additional protocol-driven SPECT/CT. Retrospective evaluation of planar BS and SPECT/CT images was performed by two experienced dual-trained nuclear medicine radiologists. The BS and SPECT/CT images were graded blindly using a five-point scale designed to evaluate the likelihood of a lesion being benign or malignant. Interpretation was applied on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: There was a 74.5% increase in definitive diagnostic classification and a 26.6% reduction in equivocal findings with SPECT/CT when compared to BS alone (p<0001). Of cases initially classified as "probably benign" on BS, 5.1% (10/193) were reclassified to "probably malignant" (1%) or "malignant" (4.1%) using the SPECT/CT data. The highest impact in reporter confidence was seen with SPECT/CT in the interpretation of lesions within the pelvis (34%), ribs (23%), lumbar spine (22%), and thoracic spine (21%). CONCLUSION: Protocol-driven, selective use of SPECT/CT imaging to augment planar BS reduces equivocal findings and improves reporter confidence whilst minimising the impact on patient and reporting workflows.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]