These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is Vagal Response During Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexi Stimulation a Normal Phenomenon?: Comparison Between Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation.
    Author: Iso K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nagashima K, Takahashi K, Arai M, Watanabe R, Wakamatsu Y, Otsuka N, Yagyu S, Kurokawa S, Nakai T, Ohkubo K, Hirayama A.
    Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e007281. PubMed ID: 31610720.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Ganglionated plexi (GPs) play an important role in both the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). GPs can be located by using continuous high-frequency stimulation (HFS) to elicit a vagal response, but whether the vagal response phenomenon is common to patients without AF is unknown. METHODS: HFS of the left atrial GPs was performed in 42 patients (aged 58.0±10.2 years) undergoing ablation for AF and 21 patients (aged 53.2±12.8 years) undergoing ablation for a left-sided accessory pathway. The HFS (20 Hz, 25 mA, 10-ms pulse duration) was applied for 5 seconds at 3 sites within the presumed anatomic area of each of the 5 major left atrial GPs (for a total of 15 sites per patient). We defined vagal response to HFS as prolongation of the R-R interval by >50% in comparison to the mean pre-HFS R-R interval averaged over 10 beats and active-GP areas as areas in which a vagal response was elicited. RESULTS: Overall, more active-GP areas were found in the AF group patients than in the non-AF group patients, and at all 5 major GPs, the maximum R-R interval during HFS was significantly prolonged in the AF patients. After multivariate adjustment, association was established between the total number of vagal response sites and the presence of AF. Conclusions The significant increase in vagal responses elicited in patients with AF compared with responses in non-AF patients suggests that vagal responses to HFS reflect abnormally increased GP activity specific to AF substrates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]