These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma: Visual Outcome in the Pre-Photodynamic Therapy Era versus Photodynamic Therapy Era in 458 Cases.
    Author: Shields CL, Dalvin LA, Lim LS, Chang M, Udyaver S, Mazloumi M, Vichitvejpaisal P, Su GL, Florakis E, Mashayekhi A, Shields JA.
    Journal: Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Jan; 4(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 31611094.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To analyze visual outcomes after treatment of choroidal hemangioma in the pre-photodynamic therapy (PDT) era versus PDT era. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 458 patients with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma. METHODS: Comparison of hemangioma managed in the pre-PDT (1967-2001) era versus PDT (2002-2018) era. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual acuity outcome. RESULTS: A total of 458 tumors were treated over this 51-year period. A comparison (pre-PDT [n = 220 cases] vs. PDT [n = 238 cases]) revealed PDT era patients were of older mean age (48.9 vs. 53.8 years, P = 0.002) and were more likely to have systemic hypertension (17.7% vs. 33.8%, P < 0.001), tumor location in the macula (57.4% vs. 67.5%, P = 0.01), subretinal fluid on OCT (33.3% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.01), and greater extent of overlying lipofuscin (P = 0.001). Findings of tumor basal diameter and thickness and fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography were no different in the 2 eras. Treatment (pre-PDT vs. PDT) included argon laser photocoagulation (42.1% vs. 0.4%), PDT (0% vs. 43.8%), transpupillary thermotherapy (0% vs. 0.4%), plaque radiotherapy (7.0% vs. 5.2%), external beam radiotherapy (1.4% vs. 1.3%), enucleation (0.9% vs. 0.4%), and observation (48.6% vs. 47.6%). After treatment, patients in the PDT era demonstrated better mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (1.28 vs. 0.51, P < 0.001) (Snellen equivalent 20/400 vs. 20/63, P < 0.001). Final visual acuity was ≥20/40 for those with entering vision of ≥20/40 (59.6% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.001) and for those with entering vision of 20/50-20/200 (25.4% vs. 47.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Management of choroidal hemangioma in the PDT era has allowed for significantly better visual outcome compared with the pre-PDT era, with mean final visual acuity of 20/400 (pre-PDT era) versus 20/63 (PDT era).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]