These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Comparison of glenohumeral joint rotation between asymptomatic subjects and patients with subacromial impingement syndrome using cine-magnetic resonance imaging: a cross-sectional study.
    Author: Kenmoku T, Matsuki K, Ochiai N, Sonoda M, Ishida T, Sasaki S, Tanaka Y, Nakawaki M, Nagura N, Tazawa R, Sasaki Y, Banks SA, Takaso M.
    Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct 25; 20(1):475. PubMed ID: 31653240.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study to compare glenohumeral joint motion during active shoulder axial rotation between subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) shoulders and asymptomatic shoulders using cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Measurement of glenohumeral joint motion via manual intervention does not assess the usual glenohumeral joint motion, and the glenoid surface cannot be confirmed manually. However, cine-MRI can produce clear images of glenohumeral joint rotation. Therefore, we sought to measure the active ROM of the glenohumeral rotation using cine-MRI. METHODS: Seventy-three shoulders in 42 asymptomatic volunteers and 110 SIS shoulders in 103 consecutive patients were included in this study. We evaluated 36 matched pairs (72 shoulders in total) adjusting for baseline characteristics with propensity score matching method. The patients underwent cine-MRI during axial rotation of the adducted arm. During imaging, participants rotated their shoulder from the maximum internal rotation to the maximum external rotation over the first 10 s and then back to the maximum internal rotation over the subsequent 10 s. We assessed internal/external rotation, and compared the asymptomatic and SIS shoulders in this regard. Evaluation of rotation angles was performed on a series of axial images through the humeral head center. RESULTS: The mean internal rotation angles of the asymptomatic and patient groups were 55° ± 10° and 41° ± 23°, respectively, (P = .002; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 51-58 vs 33-49); the mean external rotation angles were 47° ± 15° and 21° ± 25°, respectively, (P < .001; CI, 42-52 vs 13-29). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to asymptomatic shoulders, SIS shoulders showed significantly restricted glenohumeral rotation as determined by cine-MRI. Our results suggested that the significant limitation of active glenohumeral rotation might be associated with rotator cuff dysfunction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]