These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Alveolar and poorly differentiated rhabdomyosarcoma. A clinicopathologic, light-microscopic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical analysis.
    Author: Seidal T, Kindblom LG, Angervall L.
    Journal: APMIS; 1988 Sep; 96(9):825-38. PubMed ID: 3166809.
    Abstract:
    Eighteen poorly differentiated, small and dark cell malignancies afflicting young individuals without light-microscopic evidence of a rhabdomyoblastic differentiation or a growth pattern characteristic of rhabdomyosarcoma were analyzed and compared with a series of 30 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas of varying differentiation, where the diagnosis could be established light-microscopically. The study comprised clinical data, light and electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry, using a battery of mono- and polyclonal antibodies against intermediate filaments, myoglobin, epithelial membrane antigen, neuron-specific enolase, S-100 and leucocyte common antigen. All 30 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas were positive for desmin, while a minority were positive for myoglobin, using monoclonal antibodies. In 8 of the 18 small and dark cell malignancies, support for a rhabdomyoblastic differentiation was obtained by a positive staining for desmin. In only 3 of these 8 cases was there ultrastructural evidence of rhabdomyosarcoma. The results of the investigation indicate that immunohistochemistry is a more useful tool than electron microscopy in the diagnosis of poorly differentiated rhabdomyosarcoma and that the criteria for the diagnosis of poorly differentiated rhabdomyosarcoma may need to be reformulated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]