These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Estimation of maize evapotraspiration under drought stress - A case study of Huaibei Plain, China.
    Author: Yuan H, Cui Y, Ning S, Jiang S, Yuan X, Tang G.
    Journal: PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223756. PubMed ID: 31689311.
    Abstract:
    Given the importance and complexity of crop evapotranspiration estimation under drought stress, an experiment tailored for maize under drought stress was completed using six sets of large-scale weighing lysimeters at the Xinmaqiao Comprehensive Experimental Irrigation and Drainage Station, Anhui Province, China. Our aim was to analyze maize evapotranspiration under different drought conditions. Based on estimates of maize evapotranspiration under no drought stress using the dual crop coefficient approach, we optimized and calibrated basic crop coefficients Kcbini, Kcbmid, Kcbend, and the maximum crop coefficient Kcmax using a genetic algorithm. Measurements of solar radiation at the experimental station were used to derive the empirical parameters a and b from the Angstrom formula through the genetic algorithm, and then evapotranspiration was calculated for the reference crop (ET0). We then estimated the maize evapotranspiration under drought using the dual crop coefficient approach. The results indicated that a slight water deficit during the earlier stage of vegetative growth may stimulate the maize homeostatic mechanism and increase tolerance to drought stress in later growth periods. Maize evapotranspiration significantly decreased if drought stress continued into the elongation stage, and the same degree of drought stress had a greater influence on the middle and later stages of vegetative and reproductive growth. The calibrated results for Kcbini, Kcbmid, Kcbend, and Kcmax were 0.155, 1.218, 0.420 and 1.497 respectively. We calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean relative error (MRE) of maize evapotranspiration under no drought stress over the full growing season using a dual crop coefficient approach, and the results were 1.33 mm/day, 0.99 mm/day, and 1.30%, respectively, or 18.40%, 17.50%, and 91.11% lower than results using the recommended coefficients. The RMSE, MAE, and MRE results for maize under drought stress during two full growth periods were 1.18 mm/day, 0.98 mm/day, and 13.92%, respectively. These results were higher than maize without drought stress, but better than the estimated results based on FAO-56 recommended values. Therefore, maize evapotranspiration estimation under drought stress using the dual crop coefficient approach and genetic algorithm was reasonable and reliable. This study provides a theoretical basis for developing suitable regional irrigation programs and decreasing losses due to agricultural drought.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]