These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Recanalization of Emergent Large Intracranial Vessel Occlusion through Intravenous Thrombolysis: Frequency, Clinical Outcome, and Reperfusion Pattern.
    Author: Serna Candel C, Aguilar Pérez M, Hellstern V, AlMatter M, Bäzner H, Henkes H.
    Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis; 2019; 48(3-6):115-123. PubMed ID: 31747667.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: According to a recent meta-analysis, 1 out of 10 patients with emergent large intracranial vessel occlusion (ELVO) causing stroke have recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. However, rate, clinical outcome, and recanalization pattern of this phenomenon are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Patients with ELVO recanalized only by IVT were analyzed, and frequency of recanalization, clinical outcome, safety variables, and reperfusion pattern were assessed. These patients were compared to a group of patients with ELVO who underwent endovascular thrombectomy with or without prior IVT. RESULTS: Successful or sufficient recanalization after IVT alone occurred in 81 of 760 patients (10.6%) with ELVO who had been referred for endovascular thrombectomy. These 81 patients (group 1) were compared to a group of patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy with prior IVT (group 2) or without (group 3). A good clinical outcome at 90 days was seen in 61.7% of patients in group 1, 32.2% in group 2, and 34.5% in group 3 (p < 0.001). The 3 groups had no significant differences in intracranial hemorrhage. IVT was not independently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mortality at 90 days was 9.9% in group 1, 20.7% in group 2, and 29.6% in group 3 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for all relevant variables, outcome and mortality differences were nonsignificant. No difference in the rate of successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] 2b/3) was found. A reperfusion mTICI 3 was achieved in 18.5% in group 1, 60.7% in group 2, and 57.1% in group 3 (p < 0.001). Patients in group 1 had lower chance of achieving a complete recanalization (mTICI 3) compared to patients in group 2, OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.08-0.29) and in group 3, OR 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.32; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary IVT in ELVO caused a recanalization rate of 10.6%, making endovascular treatment either unnecessary or impossible. Early recanalization of ELVO with only IVT is associated with a 61.7% independence rate at 90 days and similar successful reperfusion rates (mTICI2b/3) compared to ELVO treated with endovascular treatment, with or without previous IVT. However, recanalization only through IVT achieves a lower rate of mTICI 3 reperfusion when compared to endovascular treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]