These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC for imaging of neuroendocrine tumours: comparison with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT.
    Author: Yadav D, Ballal S, Yadav MP, Tripathi M, Roesch F, Bal C.
    Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Apr; 47(4):860-869. PubMed ID: 31754796.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Recently, the new hybrid chelator DATA (6-amino-1,4-diazepine-triacetate) has been introduced, which has the advantage of high yield and radiolabelling of DATA-based octreotide derivative (TOC) at room temperature in contrast to tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate (DOTA) that needs 95 °C for effective labelling. However, the diagnostic potential of DATA-TOC has not been studied with other chelators in humans. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC (which is the current standard for imaging neuroendocrine tumours (NET)) in patients of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). METHODS: Fifty patients (thirty-one males and nineteen females) with biopsy-proven GEP-NETs were included in the study. Patients age ranged from 14 to 75 years (mean 46.11 years). All patients underwent two PET studies with [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC. Images were evaluated visually and semi-quantitatively using maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of tumour, mediastinum and liver. Tumour-to-liver (T/L) and tumour-to-mediastinum (T/M) SUVmax ratios were computed. For the purpose of comparison, patient-wise as well as lesion-wise analysis was carried out. The nonparametric-related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparison of the SUVmax values and ratios. RESULTS: On visual evaluation, the biodistribution and image quality of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC was similar to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC. Physiological liver uptake was lower in [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC as compared with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC, 7.65 ± 5.37 vs 8.94 ± 5.95 (p = 0.009), respectively. On a patient-wise analysis, both [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC were lesion-positive in the 44 patients (88%) and were negative in the 6 patients (12%). On a lesion-based analysis, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC had 98.6% concordance with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC (232 out of 235 lesions detected). The target tumour SUVmax on [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC were 36.63 ± 32.24 and 40.82 ± 36.89, respectively (p = 0.097). The T/L SUVmax ratios were not significantly different (5.99 ± 5.52 vs 5.67 ± 4.96, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC PET/CT imaging produced results that were comparable with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC. It, thus, has potential utility as an effective and safe alternative to 68Ga-DOTA-NOC with the added benefit of ease, cost-effective and improved yield of instant kit-type synthesis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]