These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Quantifying the mechanical work of breathing in men and women during rowing. Author: Reinhard PA, Gerson EAM, Sheel AW, Archiza B. Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Feb; 120(2):381-390. PubMed ID: 31813046. Abstract: PURPOSE: To quantify the mechanical work of breathing (Wb) during an indoor rowing test in men and women. Additionally, to compare sex-based differences in the Wb and its components through a rowing test. METHODS: Fifteen collegiate rowers were recruited (8 women/7 men) and performed a 2000 m rowing test on a rowing ergometer. Esophageal pressure was measured during exercise via balloon catheterization, after which pressure-volume curves were used to calculate total, inspiratory resistive and elastic, and total expiratory Wb. RESULTS: Men had significantly higher values of instantaneous and cumulative total Wb at and beyond 37.5% (430.4 ± 42.5 vs. 282.1 ± 45.1 J min-1, P < 0.05) and 62.5% (1946.8 ± 150.9 vs. 1360.1 ± 197.2 J, P < 0.05) total exercise time, respectively. However, when compared at the same minute ventilation, women had higher values of total (at and above ~ 140 L min-1), inspiratory resistive (at and above ~ 120 L min-1), and inspiratory elastic (at and above ~ 135 L min-1) Wb, whereas men presented higher total expiratory Wb compared to women at any ventilation. CONCLUSION: Although female rowers present higher relative values of inspiratory resistive and elastic Wb, their male counterparts develop greater ventilatory efforts during a 2000 m rowing test, resulting in a larger total mechanical Wb. We interpret these findings to mean that the Wb reflects both anatomical (i.e., airways and lung sizes) and respiratory (i.e., minute ventilation) sex differences during rowing.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]