These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Sensitivity and specificity values of high-risk HPV DNA, p16/ki-67 and HPV mRNA in young women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL).
    Author: Frega A, Pavone M, Sesti F, Leone C, Bianchi P, Cozza G, Colombrino C, Lukic A, Marziani R, De Sanctis L, Delli Carpini G, Caserta D, Ciavattini A.
    Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Dec; 23(24):10672-10677. PubMed ID: 31858534.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity values of high-risk HPV DNA test, p16/ki-67, and HPV mRNA in histologically high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN2-CIN3) in women aged 21-24 years with diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) at pap smear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 342 patients between 21-24 years old, attending spontaneously our clinics, 118 with ASCUS and 224 with LSIL, were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent colposcopy and biopsies were performed in the areas with major changes. All patients were tested at the same time for p16/ki-67, high-risk HPV DNA and HPV mRNA. RESULTS: Nineteen out of 118 women with ASCUS showed a high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion, 11 out of 118 (9.32%) CIN2, and 8 out of 118 (6.78%) CIN3. The sensitivity of high-risk HPV DNA was 99.9%, and the specificity 23.2%; p16/ki-67 pointed out a sensitivity of 90.9%, and a specificity of 81.8%; HPV mRNA showed a sensitivity of 81.8%, and specificity of 87.9% in CIN2 lesions. In CIN3 lesions, the sensitivity of high-risk HPV DNA was 99.9%, while the specificity was 19.1%; p16/ki-67 showed a sensitivity of 99.9%, and a specificity of 73.7%; HPV mRNA relived a sensitivity of 87.5%, and a specificity of 80.8%. In women with LSIL, a total of 42/224 (18.75%) of CIN2 were found at the histopathological examination, while 17/224 (7.59%) women presented a CIN3. No case of invasive cancer was identified. High-risk HPV DNA was positive in 190/224 (84.8%), p16/ki-67 in 119/224 (53.1%), and HPV mRNA in 104/224 (46.4%). In women with CIN2, the sensitivity of high-risk HPV DNA was of 92.8%, and the specificity 17.5%, the sensitivity of p16/ki-67 was 95.2%, and specificity 61.8%. HPV mRNA showed a sensitivity of 88.8% and a specificity of 87.8%. In women with CIN3, the sensitivity of high-risk HPV DNA was 88.2%, and the specificity 29.7%; p16/ki-67 pointed out a sensitivity of 94.1%, and a specificity of 49%; HPV mRNA showed a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 80.6. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the high rate of spontaneous regression of high-grade lesions in young women, these tests, in particular, the HPV mRNA test, used as a triage test for ASCUS or LSIL, can modify follow-up triage strategy. In fact, this biomarker, due to its high specificity, could lead to a cytology repetition instead of an immediate colposcopy, avoiding over diagnosis and potential overtreatment in this category of women.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]