These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with gastric cancer: Comparison with conventional DWI techniques at 3.0T: A preliminary study.
    Author: Cai JS, Chen HY, Chen JY, Lu YF, Sun JZ, Zhou Y, Yu RS.
    Journal: Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(1):e18616. PubMed ID: 31895817.
    Abstract:
    To evaluate the qualitative image quality and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of reduced field-of view (rFOV) and full field-of-view (fFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences at 3.0 T in patients with gastric cancer.Fifty-three patients (37 males, 16 females; mean age, 63.3 ± 10.3 years) with 60 lesions with gastric cancer who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) scans, including both rFOV-DWI and fFOV-DWI, were retrospectively analyzed. Two observers subjectively evaluated image quality for both the fFOV-DWI and rFOV-DWI sequences regarding the anatomic details, distortion, lesion conspicuity, artifacts, and overall image quality. The mean ADC values of gastric cancer were calculated. The Wilcoxon test and paired samples t test were used. Interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.The mean scores based on the 2 observers demonstrated significant differences in image quality in terms of anatomic details, distortion, lesion conspicuity, artifacts and overall image quality at both b values between rFOV-DWI and fFOV-DWI (P < .05) in the whole gastric area. rFOV-DWI yielded significantly better scores in image quality at b = 800 seconds/mm (P < .05) in patients with esophagogastric junction cancers, but there were no significant differences in the gastric corpus and gastric antrum region. The mean tumor ADC values of rFOV-DWI were significantly lower than those of fFOV-DWI (1.237 ± 0.228 × 10-3 mm/second vs 1.683 ± 0.322 × 10-3 mm/second, P < .001).rFOV-DWI yielded significantly better image quality (anatomic details, distortion, lesion conspicuity, artifacts, overall image quality) and more accurate ADC measurements than fFOV-DWI did.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]