These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Formation and removal of disinfection by-products in a full scale drinking water treatment plant. Author: MacKeown H, Adusei Gyamfi J, Schoutteten KVKM, Dumoulin D, Verdickt L, Ouddane B, Criquet J. Journal: Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb 20; 704():135280. PubMed ID: 31896211. Abstract: In this case study, high sensitivity simple methods for the analysis of trihalomethanes (THM4), iodinated-trihalomethanes (I-THMs), haloacetic acids (HAAs), bromide, iodide and iodate have been developed. A one-step procedure for the analysis of haloacetic acids by head-space GC-MS provides good reproducibility and low limits of quantification (≤50 ng L-1). These methods were applied to characterize the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) in a full scale drinking water treatment plant. In this treatment plant, the incorporation of bromine into THMs increases throughout the water treatment line, due to the formation of bromine reactive species favored by the decrease of competition between dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and bromide towards chlorine. A linear correlation has been observed between the bromine incorporation factor and the Br-/DOC mass ratio. The conversion of iodine to iodate by chlorination occurs in this water due to the relatively high bromide concentration. Moreover, a higher formation of iodate compared to iodide levels in the raw water is observed indicating a degradation of organic iodinated compounds. The formation of I-THMs was constant in terms of quantity and speciation between campaigns despite fluctuating concentrations of DOC and total iodine in the raw water. A preferential removal of DBPs formed by the intermediate chlorination in the order I-DBPs > Br-DBPs > Cl-DBPs occurs during the subsequent activated carbon filtration. The removal rates range from 25 to 36% for the regulated THM4, from 82 to 93% for the ∑I-THMs and 95% for haloacetic acids. The assessment of the relative toxicity shows that despite a much lower concentration of HAAs (<10% of the total mass of measured DBPs) compared to THMs, these compounds are responsible for 75% of the relative cytotoxicity of the treated water. Bromoacetic acid on its own accounts for more than 60% of the overall toxicity of the 17 compounds included in this study.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]