These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Arterial spin labeling versus 18F-FDG-PET to identify mild cognitive impairment.
    Author: Dolui S, Li Z, Nasrallah IM, Detre JA, Wolk DA.
    Journal: Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 25():102146. PubMed ID: 31931403.
    Abstract:
    Neurodegenerative biomarkers support diagnosis and measurement of disease progression in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET), which measures glucose metabolism, is one of the most commonly used biomarkers of neurodegeneration, but is expensive and requires exposure to ionizing radiation. Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides non invasive quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF), which is believed to be tightly coupled to glucose metabolism. Here we aimed to compare the performances of ASL derived CBF and 18F-FDG-PET derived standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in discriminating patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from older Controls. 2D pseudo continuous ASL and 18F-FDG-PET data with adequate scan quality from 50 MCI study participants (age=73.0 ± 7.0 years, 16 female) and 35 older controls (age=70.2 ± 6.9 years, 20 female), acquired in close temporal proximity, usually on the same day, were considered for this study. We assessed Control-patient group differences both at voxel level and within a priori regions of interest (ROIs). We also compared their area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with mean CBF or SUVR in a priori selected posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). CBF and 18F-FDG-PET showed abnormalities in similar areas, particularly in medial temporoparietal regions, consistent with the typically observed pattern of prodromal AD. The hypoperfusion pattern with relative CBF (obtained by normalizing voxel CBF values with mean CBF in putamen) was more localized than with absolute CBF. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the T-scores corresponding to the group-differences obtained with 18F-FDG-PET SUVR and absolute and relative ASL CBF were 0.46 and 0.43 (p<0.001), respectively. ROI analyses were also consistent, with the strongest differences observed in PCC (p<0.01). 18F-FDG-PET SUVR, absolute and relative CBF in the PCC ROI demonstrated moderate and similar discriminatory power in predicting MCI status with AUC of 0.71 ± 0.12, 0.77 ± 0.12 and 0.74 ± 0.13, respectively. In conclusion, ASL CBF may be a reasonable, less expensive and safer substitute for 18F-FDG-PET in clinical research.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]