These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against phenotypically defined extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients (SMART 2016).
    Author: Karlowsky JA, Kazmierczak KM, Young K, Motyl MR, Sahm DF.
    Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Apr; 96(4):114925. PubMed ID: 31954597.
    Abstract:
    The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution testing method (M07, 11th edition, 2018) was used to determine MICs for ceftolozane/tazobactam and eight comparator agents against 21,952 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae submitted by 161 clinical laboratories in 51 countries in 2016 as a part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (M100 29th edition, 2019). 89.7% of isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 70.0%, 76.3%, 77.7%, 84.7%, 93.6%, and 96.4%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. 82.4% of isolates of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 1.5%, 7.8%, 20.3%, 71.1%, 94.7%, and 98.7%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. In vitro susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam was >60% higher than susceptibility to other advanced-generation cephalosporins among all Enterobacteriaceae and >10% higher than susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam among ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected globally in 2016.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]