These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ventilatory pattern, intrapleural pressure, and cardiac output.
    Author: Downs JB, Douglas ME, Sanfelippo PM, Stanford W, Hodges MR.
    Journal: Anesth Analg; 1977; 56(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 319705.
    Abstract:
    Continuous positive-pressure ventilation may decrease cardiac output. However, a few reports have separated the effects of positive and end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from those of mechanical ventilation. Ten surgical patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support had catheters inserted for measurement of right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), intrapleural, radial artery, airway, and atrial filling pressures, and cardiac output. All patients breathed spontaneously between mechanical breaths delivered every 30 seconds by intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV). Measurements were made with 0, 5, and 10 cm H2O PEEP, and during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) with 12 breaths/min without PEEP. Airway pressure (Paw), intrapleural pressure, RAP, and PAOP were increased by PEEP and IPPV. Intrapleural pressure increased most during IPPV (p less than 0.001). Atrial filling pressures and cardiac output were unaffected by PEEP but decreased during IPPV (p less than 0.001). Patients receiving IMV maintained negative intrapleural pressure, atrial filling pressure, cardiac output and, therefore, O2 delivery, regardless of PEEP level. The authors conclude that patients requiring mechanical respiratory support, with or without PEEP, may maintain better cardiopulmonary function when allowed some spontaneous ventilatory activity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]