These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validity of an Inexpensive Hanging Scale During Isometric Shoulder Movements.
    Author: Oliveira ML, Ferreira IC, Ferreira KR, Silveira-Nunes G, Barbosa MA, Barbosa AC.
    Journal: J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Nov 01; 29(8):1218-1221. PubMed ID: 32028259.
    Abstract:
    CONTEXT: Strength assessment is essential to prescribe exercise in sports and rehabilitation. Low-cost valid equipment may allow continuous monitoring of training. OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of a very low-cost hanging scale by comparing differences in the measures of peak force to a laboratory grade load cell during shoulder abduction, flexion, extension, and internal and external rotations. DESIGN: Analytical study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two healthy subjects (18 women, age 26 [10] y, height 172 [8] cm, mass 69 [13] kg, body mass index 23 [4] kg/m2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dependent variable was the maximal peak force (in kilogram-force). The independent variable was the instrument (laboratory grade load cell and hanging scale). RESULTS: No differences were observed while comparing the results. The intraclass correlation coefficients1,1 ranged from .96 to .99, showing excellent results. The Cronbach alpha test also returned >.99 for all comparisons. The SEM ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 kgf, with an averaged SD from 0.24 to 0.38 kgf. The correlation was classified as high for all tested movements (r > .99; P < .001), with excellent adjusted coefficients of determination (.96 < r2 < .99). Bland-Altman results showed high levels of agreement with bias ranging from 0.27 to 0.48. CONCLUSIONS: Hanging scale provides valid measures of isometric strength with similar output measures as laboratory grade load cell.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]