These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Efficacy of coupling intermittent theta-burst stimulation and 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Author: Meng Y, Zhang D, Hai H, Zhao YY, Ma YW. Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2020; 38(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 32039879. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Both 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are reported to benefit upper limb motor function rehabilitation in patients with stroke. However, the efficacy of combining 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS has not been adequately explored. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effects of 1 Hz rTMS and the combination of 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS on the upper limb motor function in the subacute phase post-stroke. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and iTBS over the ipsilesional M1), Group B (contralesional 1 Hz rTMS and ipsilesional sham iTBS), and Group C (contralesional sham 1 Hz rTMS and ipsilesional sham iTBS). The participants received the same conventional rehabilitation accompanied by sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation for two weeks (5 days one week). Motor-evoked potential (MEP), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), and Barthel Index (BI) were performed before and after the sessions. RESULTS: Group A showed greater UE-FMA, BI, and MEP amplitude improvement and more significant decrement in MEP latency compared to Group B and Group C in testable patients. Correlation analyses in Group A revealed a close relation between ipsilesional MEP amplitude increment and UE-FMA gain. CONCLUSIONS: The combining of 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS protocol in the present study is tolerable and more beneficial for motor improvement than the single use of 1 Hz rTMS in patients with subacute stroke.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]