These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Changes in medial elbow elasticity and joint space gapping during maximal gripping: reliability and validity in evaluation of the medial elbow joint using ultrasound elastography.
    Author: Hattori H, Akasaka K, Otsudo T, Hall T, Amemiya K, Mori Y, Sakaguchi K, Tachibana Y.
    Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jun; 29(6):e245-e251. PubMed ID: 32061511.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Medial elbow injuries are common in baseball pitchers. This study investigated the reliability of medial elbow elastography measurement and the characteristics of the medial elbow stabilizers. METHODS: Medial elbow joint space gapping and the strain ratios of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and the forearm flexor-pronator muscle (FPM) were measured at rest and during gripping in 29 healthy college students. The intraclass correlation coefficients of elastography were calculated. The data were compared between tissues and between rest and gripping. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1,3) of the elastography measurements were 0.91 and 0.83 for the UCL and 0.80 and 0.85 for the FPM for each examiner. Medial elbow joint space gapping during gripping (3.1 ± 0.6 mm) was significantly less than that at rest (3.8 ± 0.8 mm, P < .001). The strain ratios for both the UCL and FPM during gripping were significantly greater than those at rest (17.64 ± 10.97 during gripping vs. 3.94 ± 1.92 at rest for UCL, P < .001; 1.72 ± 0.99 during gripping vs. 0.35 ± 1.92 at rest for FPM, P < .001). The strain ratio for the UCL was significantly greater than that for the FPM both at rest (P < .001) and during gripping (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Elastography measurements of the UCL and FPM have almost perfect reliability. Gripping reduces medial elbow joint space gapping compared with rest. For both tissues, gripping reduces their elasticity compared with rest. The elasticity of the UCL is less than that of the FPM both at rest and during gripping.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]