These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Magnetic resonance imaging as a single diagnostic tool for verifying radiosurgery outcomes of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula.
    Author: Hu YS, Guo WY, Lin CJ, Wu HM, Luo CB, Wu CA, Lee CC, Yang HC, Liu KD, Chung WY.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108866. PubMed ID: 32065928.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: MRI and MR angiography (MRA) are noninvasive methods for examining cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (CSDAVFs) after radiosurgery. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of unenhanced MRI/3-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) MRA in evaluating CSDAVF obliteration as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: From 1995-2012, 48 cases of CSDAVFs received Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) and had undergone both unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA and DSA for posttreatment evaluation. Two blinded observers independently interpreted the results of MRI/MRA. The results of MRI/MRA were compared with those of DSA. The sensitivity (the probability of MRI/MRA showing obliteration when DSA showed complete obliteration), specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CSDAVF obliteration were reported. RESULTS: The median interval between the final MRI/MRA and the subsequent DSA was 2 months. Follow-up DSA revealed that 38 of 48 (79.2 %) CSDAVFs were completely obliterated. The results of interobserver agreement assessment showed almost perfect agreement between the 2 observers. For unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA, the observed sensitivity was 84.2 %, specificity was 100 %, positive predictive value was 100 %, and negative predictive value was 62.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA alone may be adequate to document the complete obliteration of CSDAVFs after GKS. Time-resolved MRA or DSA can be reserved for a suspected residual CSDAVF after a sufficient latency period after GKS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]