These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Georg Schaltenbrand (1897-1979) and his research without moral boundaries on multiple sclerosis].
    Author: Martin M, Fangerau H, Karenberg A.
    Journal: Nervenarzt; 2020 Feb; 91(Suppl 1):43-52. PubMed ID: 32067085.
    Abstract:
    In 1953 the prominent German neurologist Georg(es) Schaltenbrand became president of the German Neurological Society (DGN) and in 1967 honorary president. Less well known is the fact that from 1933 to 1936 he was member of the "Stahlhelm" and the Storm Troopers (SA). In 1937 he joined the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) and other Nazi organizations. For the last three decades Schaltenbrand's name has primarily been associated with human experiments performed in 1940. His objective was to prove the viral etiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). To that end he injected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drawn from allegedly infected monkeys and MS patients into severely handicapped patients from the psychiatric asylum Werneck near Schweinfurt as well as into severely ill patients from the University Hospital of Würzburg without their consent. Weeks later he withdrew CSF samples from the recipients, sometimes repeatedly to control parameters of inflammation. Although not all details of his test series can be clarified, there is no doubt that he violated prevailing laws and ethical standards. According to the present state of knowledge, he was the only German professor of neurology during the Nazi era who performed such experiments on humans in terms of "research without moral boundaries". He later justified his actions by arguing that he had intended to exert a positive effect on the mentally ill. Judicial investigations ended in 1948 without an indictment. Long after his death, in 1994 the "Schaltenbrand experiments" became known to a wider public and three years later the Medical Faculty of Würzburg condemned the unethical research and distanced itself from its former member. Today, Schaltenbrand's study is assessed as an unacceptable form of research on particularly vulnerable patients for the benefit of third parties. As a result, ethical norms formulated in the 1930s were reinforced by international guidelines, e.g. the Declaration of Helsinki drafted by the World Medical Association.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]